The weather is getting colder and colder, and it is a must -have choice for many people to go out. However, the results of the comparative test results released by the Consumer Association of the Beijing -Tianjin -Hebei Three Lands yesterday showed that nearly 40 % of the samples of the 50 pieces were unrealistic; three of them were unqualified.
Three -place Consumer Association issued three brands of samples such as Mu Linsen and other three brands of samples unqualified
The results of this comparison test showed that the nominal TECTOP card was a men’s three -in -one outdoor clothing, a nominal Mu Linsen card, a elastic two -piece set, nominal FMIX card, a set of men’s down jacket+couple pants, respectively due to the causes, respectively There are quality problems such as fibrous fiber content, sweat -resistant coloring accuracy, etc., and have been judged as unqualified products.
Shan Xuelei, deputy director of the National Weaving Product Quality Supervision and Inspection Center, said that the basic safety technical specifications of the national textile products stipulate that if the fiber content and sweat resistance are not qualified, the product cannot be sold.
The results of the comparative test show,
The recommended national standard “Outdoor Sports Clothing Charge” is clear that the charge is made of textile fabrics with waterproof and humidity function. It is used for outdoor sports and waterproof and humidity. Experts said that in addition to the quality requirements of general clothing, the charge products should also have the function of waterproof and humidity, so the functional testing of hedging clothing products is particularly important.
The water pressure (before washing) of the jeep and Norshilan cards did not meet the standard requirements. Named SCALER’s assault clothing sample surface anti -humidity (before washing) does not meet the standard requirements of the “Outdoor Sports Clothing Championship”. Named TFO, Antarctic, FMIX and other brands of assault samples on the surface of the brands of the brands (before washing), and the water pressure (before washing) did not meet the standard requirements, and the waterproof performance of the sample was worrying.
Experts said that the wetness performance of clothing refers to the ability of water steam penetration of clothing. During the long -term outdoor sports, the human body will emit a lot of water vapor and poor moisture. It does not achieve the effect of keeping warm, but it will produce a dampness of discomfort.
Confusing the product name of the jacket is greasy
The reporter’s online and offline shopping malls found that the names of the so -called charge products claimed by some salesperson, the names marked on the label on the label are trench coats or jackets. What is going on?
Another salesman revealed to reporters that the reason why the impulse is not marked is that the waterproof and humid functions of these products cannot meet the standard requirements of the assault jacket.
He is not a professional thing. You see that my family also has a jacket. It has no rainproof index. I dare not guarantee that it is not leaking. It is a professional fabric.
It is different.
Yes, functional clothes.
The reporter noticed that the product sold by this e -commerce platform “Men and Women and Women and Wind Windproof and Waterproof” sold by this e -commerce platform shows that the product name is “outdoor three -in -one jumpsuit” in the product details, claiming that the fabric has “windproof, waterproof, warmth, keep warm, keep warm, keep warm, keep warm, warmth, warmth, warmth, warm, warm, warm, warm, warm, warm, warm, warm, warm, warm, warmth, warmth, and warmth. , Breakthrough “and other functions.
After buying, the reporter found that the outsourcing, labels and tags of this product did not show any information on the tag, showing that this product is a jacket, and the name named on the tag is a “fashion jacket”. Why did you buy a jacket? The customer service staff told reporters that the product name on the tag can be changed at will as needed.
The reporter’s further investigation found that it is not uncommon for online publicity to be inconsistent with the actual product name.
The comparison test results released by the consumer associations of Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei yesterday showed that among the 18 samples of the 18 pieces of functional names, 4 sample web pages were promoted as charge clothes, but the actual sample clearly showed other clothing names. It has not performed the standard of charge.
Yang Xiaojun, Secretary -General of the Beijing Consumer Association, said that the sample of Mengxiang Xiangpai was tested on the Internet. It said on the Internet that he was a charge and promoted windproof and waterproof functions. In fact, the male jacket is marked. The explicit execution standard is the standard of single -clip clothing. This standard has no functional requirements at all.
Experts said that the standards of ordinary clothing do not involve functionality, claiming to be assault clothes, but the standards are labeled for ordinary clothing standards. Online publicity and actual samples are not consistent with the name of the samples. Essence At present, the Beijing Consumers Association has transferred unqualified samples to the Beijing Market Supervision and Administration Bureau for investigation and punishment.
Editor -in -Chief of the column: Zhang Wu text editor: Song Yanlin Title Picture Source: Tuwa Creative Picture Editor: Shao Jing
Source: Author: CCTV Finance